I've updated it. For by rereading it, I realize that a bunch of attorneys wrote the Physicist's Conservation of Energy Law. And then Einstein went and misrepresented that law to us by giving us a false sense of enlarged difficulty as to how to play with it and requiring a huge government grant for nuclear physics experiments when my simple circuit accomplishes it.
Like any good attorney, the truth is hidden in plain sight. Ergo, it has a loop hole in it....
It's not as complicated as Einstein has led us to believe. When performing mind-blowing time dilation thought experiments using a pair of twins and sending one away in a rocket at nearly the speed of light, no such fantasy is required. The following illustrates how easy it is to "beat" this law.
Shifting the voltage versus the current sine waves of A/C electricity is sufficient enough to dilate time RELATIVE TO EACH WAVE BY COMPARISON TO EACH OTHER'S VIEWPOINT.
Isn't that what the two twins experiment was all about? Shifting their points of view regarding their individual time-frames relative to one another? !!!
And if the shift skips past a mere 90 degrees of zero power factor all the way to 180 degrees of separation, then we will have succeeded in dilating time in a manner that does not decompose electricity into its constituent ingredients. This decomposition occurred with the Trans-Atlantic Telegraph Cable in the latter part of the 1800s, but was solved by Oliver Heaviside by wrapping the copper core of the oceanic cable with iron ribbon or iron wire to boost the magnetic portion of the signal which had been decaying. The electrostatic portion had been doing fine. But it takes both halves to make a whole of electricity.
Electrical engineers have been doing all along the decomposition half of Eric's electrical theory (whenever a transmission line's power factor shifts to zero). By comparison, Eric keeps telling us he has done BOTH TYPES OF MANIPULATION.
See what a trick it has been for the attorneys, turned physicists, have misguided us yet again by translating Eric's "decomposition of electricity into its constituent ingredients" into the electrical engineer's phrase, "zero power factor"!!!!!
It's that simple provided that it doesn't cost us more than the outcome to accomplish this. Op-amps are always given to us as an example of how to shift voltage relative to current by 180 degrees.
Magicians love to misguide our attention away from what's really good to know! Because opamps will cost us too much to accomplish what I can do using mere micro amps undergoing simulation in my circuit....
My non-theory English and Spanish "Extending the Range of an EV...etc" books at Amazon and Payhip manages to fulfill these requirements...