Over unity is simply not possible. Cheers. —— Friendly criticism from a YouTuber which can be found here…
My response…
Energy is created (appears out of nowhere) at pages 34-56 and at 88-103…
Correcting the Lie of Physics ~ Energy is not Always Conserved: Conservation of Energy is Not a Law. It is a Condition.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B09XVMZKM6/ref=cm_sw_r_awdo_1J193HEAGTP88GZH7PD0
Energy is destroyed (unaccounted for; disappears) at pages 82-87.
The square root of negative one is the source where free energy arises from (aka, non-thermodynamic overunity: more apparent power exiting a circuit by comparison to the apparent power entering into it) and the sink for the disappearance of reactive power (aka, non-thermodynamic underunity: less apparent power exiting a circuit by comparison to more apparent power entering into it). This results in the non-accountability of all energy transfers and conversions which steps outside of the domain of thermodynamics as we know it, today.
And since reactive power can readily be converted into real power by four different methods that I know of, in a roundabout fashion, free energy is real and not a fiction. These four methods are…
1. Resistance.
2. Full rectification bridge of four diodes converting AC to DC.
3. Bifilar counter-wound coil.
4. Spark gap.
When oscillating current cannot become saturated, it no longer exhibits a sine wave. Instead, it exhibits triangular waves brought about (in my circuits) by the separation of the phase of current from the phase of voltage by 1/2 cycle of oscillation, namely: 180° of angular separation. This is the passive sign convention’s definition of the generation of power but is not occurring inside of a generator. Instead, it is occurring inside a circuit powered by a feeble voltage input no different than the quantity of voltage available in our environment.
It is necessary to keep this input voltage extremely low so as to prevent the throughput of voltage. Voltage throughput would cause current to maintain the same polarity as voltage outside of the source of input.
But when voltage throughput is broken, impedance overwhelms voltage input which can have two different results: either a comatose circuit by conventional standards or else an over unity circuit depending on how it is constructed.
An over unity circuit must take advantage of capacitance and inductance to create a condition of the non-saturation of current in order to maintain the growth of reactive power so that this growth can accumulate to a reasonable amount necessary to power our devices.
Since reactive power is lossless, a.k.a. does not interact with thermodynamic conversions or losses, it can only accumulate until converted into real power by one method or another.
I think a major contributing factor to our misunderstanding of free energy is our misunderstanding of the movement of energy across a conductor.
Electrical energy changes state within the valence shells of an atom, but does not exit the atom nor enter into it. This is an illusion brought on by our pattern-oriented brain which sees a ripple and thinks it is the movement of something substantial when all it is is the movement of a pattern that our brain recognizes. And that pattern is the ridge (or peak of energy) that is moving - not the energy itself.
In order for energy to move, the matter which hosts that energy would have to move as well. But such is not the case within a conductive medium such as a strand of copper wire. {It is more likely to occur within a thundercloud of ionized particles for instance.} All the atoms of copper stay in one place along with the electrons within their valence shells.
But since all of the valence electrons are interconnected along the entire strand of a conductive medium, all of this electrical energy is shared among all of those atoms as a collective storehouse of potential energy.
All of the input energy is wasted on performing a non-energetic task of commanding the rise and fall of energetic states of the valence electrons throughout the entire length of a conductive medium. Conversely, all of the energy required to power our devices is coming from the materials of construction within the devices, themselves.
Thus, the practical limit of free energy is the tolerance to which the materials of construction (within a circuit) limit how much energetic excitation can occur within those materials before those materials are destroyed.
If not for this practical limit imposed by the materials of construction within a circuit, free energy would be limitlessly infinite as all of my simulations exhibit.
Joseph Newman had at least this much right… That the size of a coil matters more so than the energy which is supplied to the coil. For, if the windings of the coil is increased, then it’s inductance is increased along with its voltage resulting therefrom. And that excessive voltage can be put to good use.
