Free energy is, inherently, an unregulated source of energy. This is due to its condition of negative wattage in which its phase of current and its phase of voltage are out-of-phase by a whole half-cycle of oscillation. This condition never reaches saturation of current.
An inductor will always saturate after a certain length of time has passed in which its rise of current is allowed to reach saturation. At that point, its back EMF is zero. Back EMF only occurs when the inductor is not saturated.
A battery will reach saturation, immediately, and deliver maximum current. The quantity of current delivered by a battery will be determined by the total positive resistances of the circuit to which it is attached.
But a free energy circuit is not a circuit of positive resistance. It is a circuit of negative resistances mixed up with positive resistances. Hence, a free energy circuit will contain positive wattages mixed up with negative wattages. It is these negative wattages which indicate that the current is out-of-phase with voltage causing current to possess an inverted polarity of sign value relative to the sign value of voltage.
Apparently, I have to conclude from all of this is that...
Saturation of current is *the diagnostic check* for whether or not a circuit is capable of delivering infinite current, because it is this condition of current saturation which limits a circuit's gainful rise in output power.
Tolerance for current is another limiting factor.
Voltage is not a limitation since any quantity of voltage can accummulate and induce some serious damage.
But, the saturation of current is what hampers free energy from occurring. Supplying too much voltage to a circuit can prevent the formation of free energy since a voltage source is a source of voltage regulation. By keeping its voltage down, low enough, its ability regulate voltage (and prevent over-voltages) is reduced. This is can allow reactive voltages to rise without limitation. And the resulting currents can, then, also rise without limit since we will have taken the liberty of engineering a circuit to produce a disparity between its synchronicity of current and voltage phases by a maximum value of 180 degrees of separation between them (in time).
Free energy is, inherently, an unregulated source of energy. This is due to its condition of negative wattage in which its phase of current and its phase of voltage are out-of-phase by a whole half-cycle of oscillation. This condition never reaches saturation of current.
ReplyDeleteAn inductor will always saturate after a certain length of time has passed in which its rise of current is allowed to reach saturation. At that point, its back EMF is zero. Back EMF only occurs when the inductor is not saturated.
A battery will reach saturation, immediately, and deliver maximum current. The quantity of current delivered by a battery will be determined by the total positive resistances of the circuit to which it is attached.
But a free energy circuit is not a circuit of positive resistance. It is a circuit of negative resistances mixed up with positive resistances. Hence, a free energy circuit will contain positive wattages mixed up with negative wattages. It is these negative wattages which indicate that the current is out-of-phase with voltage causing current to possess an inverted polarity of sign value relative to the sign value of voltage.
Apparently, I have to conclude from all of this is that...
Saturation of current is *the diagnostic check* for whether or not a circuit is capable of delivering infinite current, because it is this condition of current saturation which limits a circuit's gainful rise in output power.
Tolerance for current is another limiting factor.
Voltage is not a limitation since any quantity of voltage can accummulate and induce some serious damage.
But, the saturation of current is what hampers free energy from occurring. Supplying too much voltage to a circuit can prevent the formation of free energy since a voltage source is a source of voltage regulation. By keeping its voltage down, low enough, its ability regulate voltage (and prevent over-voltages) is reduced. This is can allow reactive voltages to rise without limitation. And the resulting currents can, then, also rise without limit since we will have taken the liberty of engineering a circuit to produce a disparity between its synchronicity of current and voltage phases by a maximum value of 180 degrees of separation between them (in time).
https://is.gd/mateba
Delete