I like to simulate circuits which make more efficient use of renewable resources by recycling the forces which comprise electricity.

We originally thought the atom was the simplest unit of matter. This was put forward by Democritus of ancient Greece. But we've since modified our thinking to make the subatomic particles and their corresponding waves more fundamental than the atom. These subatomics supersede the atom for qualifying the word. Yet, we've never bothered to change our usage of the word, atom, to redirect our attention to these subatomic elements. In other words, we've never stopped calling the atom an atom and, instead, call its subatomics by the term: atom. Are we confused? What is the fundamental unit of all matter? Certainly not the atom by present line of thinking!😲

Eric P. Dollard points the way. He defines electricity as consisting of three ingredients: time, dielectricity and magnetism. I would suggest an alternate choice of words to substitute for the last two: the electromotive force and the magnetomotive force, respectively.

In any event, time would no longer be a dimension. It would be a force, although not a spatial force, but a force nonetheless. In all likelihood, the neutron is the equivalent subatomic force substituting for the word: time, since a difference of inherent frequency can easily distinguish among the various atomic numbers (along with their various isotopes) on the periodic chart of the elements and their consequentially differing atomic weights. And the electromotive force is just another way to say: electrons – especially since electrons are known to possess a charge of electron volts. And the magnetomotive force is probably an acceptable term for the concept of the proton.

Why do I bring this up?

Because my simulations have managed to bring about a shift of current from voltage by 180° of separation in a circuit powered by a sine wave voltage source. The difference between my methods and that of, let's say: an operational amplifier (for example), is that my circuits don't require any additional voltage source like the plus or minus 15V required by op-amps. Instead...

A high frequency sine wave of extremely low voltage is fed into a transformer, or a motorized transformer, of at least two parallel coils to each side of this motor-transformer. With the help of a few other components, a surge develops which requires some kind of switching alternately collapsing and rebuilding mini-surges so that the total outcome reflects the RMS equivalent of a conventional motor and prevents this device from cooking or shredding itself whenever its surge develops to an extreme value. {This sort of thing has been known to happen to shorted motors which are lightly loaded. – See: Jim Murray's Transforming Generator, developed and tested during the 1970s.}

The consequence of this is: we no longer have to listen to TED talk speakers telling us that renewables are not economical if their output capacity is limited to their size, alone. We don't have to make a bigger solar panel to deliver more power. Nor do we have to increase the size of a wind farm to service the needs of a growing population since the use of transients to amplify an A/C system are an economical method of maximizing any power source, be it a renewable or something else.

I describe this method, in a book I've been developing multiple editions of, at Amazon since Wikimedia Commons removed all of my files, recently, claiming it was nonsense. That should be for you or I to decide since Commons implies commonly available. So, I went private hoping this will give me greater immunity from anyone hitting the delete key.

Extending the Range of Electric Vehicles by Maximizing their Amp-Hours – Kindle
o, en Español
Ampliación de la Gama de Vehículos Eléctricos al Maximizar sus Horas-Amperio – Kindle