Renaming free energy
“renewable energy” is the politically correct thing to do these
days given the fact that using the former terminology is the quickest
method of getting booted from a forum and permanently locked out. And
it makes sense, from the standpoint of accuracy in speech, to call it
renewable since force is being reused to generate an endless supply
of energy. It's just that I'm addicted to the thought that if
something is endless, then it must be for free – right?
To recapitulate...
Force is not tied to time,
so it is reusable. Energy is tied to time, so that makes energy
renewable since newness implies a sense of timeliness as to whether
energy is old energy getting spent or new energy getting revived.
If it is old energy
getting spent, then it involves a positive resistance working against
the positive flow of current traveling from areas of high voltage and
proceeding towards areas of lower voltage.
Yet, if it is new energy
getting itself revived, then it involves negative resistance working
with the flow of current traveling from areas of low voltage,
or areas lacking any voltage, and moving towards areas of higher
voltage.
No comments:
Post a Comment