Mass merely Determines the Rate of Thermodynamic Conversion of Electrical Energy. Mass does not Impose any Limits to the Synthesis or Decomposition of Electrical Energy.

Mass determines...

1. The rate of conversion of...
1. Electricity converting into heat.
2. Electricity converting into a magnetic field.
3. Electricity converting into a magnetic field to yield mechanical motion.
4. Electricity converting into the chemistry of a battery during its recharge.
5. The chemistry of a battery converting into electricity during its discharge.
2. Or, the limit of conversion of...
1. The nuclei of matter transmuting into something else due to fusion or fission during a nuclear event such as: the explosion of an atomic bomb.

Mass does not determine electrical output since that is determined by the reactance of its coils and capacitors.

Did you ever hear of a limit to reactance? No! Why?

Because capacitive reactance is determined by frequency. It is not determined by some arbitrary limit imposed by anyone's policy of what is the proper reactance of a capacitor. The same holds for the complex reactance of inductors and capacitors.

Thus, the high frequency of my overunity motorized transformer is the direct result of applying the formulas, above, to the creation of a transient which amplifies the extremely low voltage input into a very large wattage output without any significant drain of current made upon that voltage source.

How much energy does it take to run a sine wave (signal) generator? The answer is: 9V to 12V regardless of the frequency being produced! And regardless of the amplitude (wattage) of the transient outcome resulting from the signal generator feeding my circuit simulated in the Micro-Cap version of Berkeley SPICE.

The only factor determining the output of my invention is the frequency of its input – not its voltage input. {In fact, voltage at the input may kill the production of transients if the source voltage is not limited to mere micro volts!} And the only factor determining the conversion of its output is the mass of its main motor coils and its rotor coils.

Frequency is potential energy. Wattage is kinetic energy. Wattage is what I pay for by way of what does it cost to run a circuit. Frequency costs me nothing yet will determine my circuit's outcome!

Transients are runaway surges which can overload a circuit, and destroy it, if left unchecked. Transients achieve this runaway condition due to their partial isolation from both the source voltage of a circuit and its load. Thus, a battery is so simple – by its design – that no isolation is possible and, thus, no surging transient can ever hamper its safe operation.

This partial isolation of a transient limits its load to a light condition and is never allowed to exceed this condition or else the transient would die.

This lightly loaded condition was described by Jim Murray concerning his Transforming Generator which, whenever shorted, created a runaway condition which could eventually destroy itself if he didn't immediately shut it off.

Unfortunately, Jim never got to patent his invention here in the United States due to a prior claim the United States Military had already made upon his invention prior to the late 1970s when Jim applied for a patent, here, in the U.S. So, he was forced to patent his device in Europe. But there's no money there for development (to speak of) by comparison to the funding which is available in the United States, so I am assuming that is why he turned his attention to other projects which might pay off and abandoned any further development of this device.

I control the production of transients to ensure their self-destructive nature does not take over the circuit, yet merely gives me overunity: more kinetic energy exiting the circuit than enters into it.

Transients increase their energy by raising their frequency. And the reactance of a circuit's coils and capacitors is directly related to its inherent frequency. If this frequency should become modified by a native transient, then no stable output is possible despite a non-varying input voltage and non-varying input frequency.

Transients were a severe problem on Edison's transmission line in New York city over a century ago when his power company was inaugurated. These transients were augmented by the lack of frequency in a D/C network.

Tesla's A/C transmission system was not in any sort of danger from transients since Tesla was using an A/C production of energy which already imposes a frequency of its own (60 Hz in America and 50 Hz in Europe) to help shut out transients from infecting its network. It's not totally immune to transients, but is a whole lot safer with less risk.

If we give personal pronouns (meaningless names) to every energy entity entering into the dielectric material separating the two plates of a capacitor, we will find that a unique set of individual entities exits the dielectric as do enter it.

To put this another way...

There is no proof to verify the identity of energy exiting the dielectric material of a capacitor has the same set of identities as that which entered into it.

This removes the limitation to assume that energy is atomic, or that energy is nameless, or that energy is a resolute entity fixed in time. Energy is as tenuous as the wind; yet, force is not.

If a manufacturing plant creates a product, they put a product code onto the bottom of that product along with a date of its manufacture to verify the unique identity of that product so that the customer can return it for repair or recall or refund should anything go wrong with it.

Well...

Energy is not atomic and energy is not eternal. It is synthesized from its constituent ingredients of the electromotive and magnetomotive forces within a context of time. This puts a time stamp onto energy as to when it is put together and whenever it is disassembled, for energy is a tenuous byproduct of eternal forces which have no time stamp or else they could not be eternal!