Listening to Eric brings my atomic ideology to
a fast halt! If there be no mass for protons and electrons, then how
can the neutrons carry all of their mass by themselves? The whole
foundation of Einstein's E=MC2
relationship hinges on the existence of matter in order for it to
have a relation with energy. Yet, without mass, there can be no
matter!
Also,
my use of the term of the: electromotive force to substitute for
Eric's use of his term of the: dielectric (to replace conventional
use of the term of the: electrostatic), and my use of the term of
the: magnetomotive force to substitute for Eric's use of his term of:
magnetism, fall apart since I no longer need to marry Eric's vision
with that of the Relativist. They are mutually exclusive since
Relativism is a fantasy while Eric deals in reality.
When
Eric is laying
out the relationships between the weight of a car coming to a
stop, he could just as easily be deriving a backwards process in
which electrodynamics creates the illusion of mass and matter when
there is no such material substance. Nor does chemistry ultimately
exist.
It's
just all electrodynamic processes.
So,
please pardon my vernacular blooper!
But,
please do not ignore my concepts since they still hold true. It's
just my use of terminology must fit in with that of Eric's to prevent
confusion from spawning as the result of my theories about
electrodynamics.
So,
whenever I say: electromotive force, I should have been saying the:
dielectric all along.
And,
whenever I say: magnetomotive force, I should be saying: magnetism.
Please
accept my apology for mucking this subject up when I only want to
make it more clear.
No comments:
Post a Comment